PHASE 01
CommitML-DSA signature · Merkle root
Sender publishes a Merkle commitment over the payload chunks, signed with ML-DSA. The commitment is the contract — tamper-evident, replay-resistant, verifiable offline.
The Lattice Transfer Protocol commits any file into a constant-size cryptographic descriptor. The file materializes at the destination — mathematically verifiable, bit-identical to the original. One protocol for every distance: datacenter, satellite, deep space.
Every transfer flows through a deterministic pipeline: a cryptographic commitment is made, the payload is dispersed across the lattice, and only an authorized recipient can materialize it.
Sender publishes a Merkle commitment over the payload chunks, signed with ML-DSA. The commitment is the contract — tamper-evident, replay-resistant, verifiable offline.
Payload is wrapped with an ML-KEM-encapsulated key, then erasure-coded across n shards. Any k recover the original. Loss-tolerant, harvest-resistant, no single point of failure.
Recipient verifies the commitment, decapsulates the key with their ML-KEM secret, and reconstructs the payload. The transfer either materializes correctly — or not at all.
LTP refuses novelty cryptography. Every primitive is NIST-standardized, peer-reviewed, and selected because lattice problems remain hard even for adversaries with a quantum computer.
Module-lattice key encapsulation. Replaces RSA and ECDH for the key-agreement layer. Security reduces to the Module-LWE problem — believed hard for both classical and quantum attackers.
Module-lattice digital signatures. Authenticates the commitment and the sender's claim. Fast verification, compact public keys, no quantum shortcut — drop-in for ECDSA in protocol stacks.
(n, k) Reed-Solomon over GF(2⁸). The payload survives loss of (n−k) shards with zero data loss. Combined with cryptographic dispersion, no individual shard is meaningful to an interceptor.
Adversaries are recording encrypted traffic today on the assumption that they'll decrypt it with a fault-tolerant quantum computer later this decade. Data with long shelf life — financial records, medical history, classified material — is already exposed. LTP isn't a retrofit for the quantum era; it's what the transfer layer looks like designed after it.
Health records, sealed court filings, defense contracts, banking ledgers — much of what we transmit today must remain confidential well past 2035.
Organizations that wait for an incident will pay a multiple of what proactive migration costs. NIST has finalized the primitives — the question is integration, not invention.
Finance, healthcare, defense, and critical infrastructure face the earliest mandates. LTP is built for the field-of-use license model these sectors already understand.
LTP is licensed by field of use. The pattern fits regulated infrastructure, mandated environments, and high-assurance data movement where the cost of a future breach exceeds the cost of preparing now.
Settlement infrastructure, interbank messaging, custody. Active exclusive licensing in blockchain settlement.
High-assurance comms, satellite payload transfer, delay-tolerant deep-space links, autonomous platforms operating under contested spectrum.
PHI in motion: cross-institution transfers, longitudinal records, research datasets with multi-decade sensitivity.
Energy, utilities, supply chain telemetry. Long-lived control data that cannot be re-issued if compromised.
Model weights, training corpora, and federated gradients moving across partners, clouds, and edge — with provenance verified end-to-end.
LatticeWorks engages selectively with partners in regulated infrastructure. Reach out to discuss field-of-use licensing, technical evaluation, or design partnership.
info@latticeworks.solutions